It is estimated that 64 000 people with psychosocial disabilities related to a mental health condition will become NDIS participants by 2019-2020.  For these people the Scheme presents a significant opportunity to increase supports and improve outcomes. However, psychosocial disability differs from physical and sensory disabilities in important ways and presents the Scheme with significant challenges.

Alongside the NDIS, the mental health sector is also undergoing significant parallel reform with the development of the Fifth National Mental Health Plan, which COAG has now adopted. People with mental illness will continue to require services even if they are not participants.  Furthermore, the committee recognises that the Scheme will provide services in conjunction with those delivered through other Commonwealth, state and territory governments. The committee acknowledges the commitment made by all governments to provide continuity of support for people with psychosocial disabilities who are not eligible for the NDIS. However, the committee has found there is a need to clarify and make public how they intend to provide these services and address the emerging gaps created by the transition of existing services into the NDIS.

Eligibility

The NDIS eligibility criteria for people with mental illness is a central concern for all stakeholders. The committee found that whilst the current eligibility criteria could be improved to provide greater clarity, the apparent reliance on diagnosis rather than functional needs is likely to result in inconsistent eligibility outcomes for applicants. This is of particular concern given the absence of a validated assessment tool for planners to assess the eligibility of people with psychosocial disabilities.  The reported lack of skills and expertise of planners in the mental health field adds to inconsistencies of access to the Scheme and planning outcomes

Planning process

The committee received evidence that the planning process to develop and review NDIS plans has not been operating well and has often resulted in unsatisfactory experiences and outcomes for people with psychosocial disabilities, their families and in some instances particularly their carers. Issues include the development of plans over the phone rather than face-to-face; not involving carers in planning discussions; waiting times and delays; the poor level of planners’ knowledge and understanding of psychosocial disability; and lack of flexibility and responsiveness to people’s changing needs. Indeed, given the episodic nature of conditions and symptoms experienced by people with a mental health condition, the current approach to the development and review of plans does not readily build in supports to respond to the fluctuating needs of participants.

Assertive Outreach

The committee recognises the critical role advocacy and outreach services can play in identifying and engaging people, their families and carers with NDIS services. In many cases the most efficient way to engage with people in the NDIS process is to work with their families and carers who have long-term, personal and special knowledge of their needs and circumstances. The operational systems in place to provide information about the NDIS and to engage with hard-to-reach cohorts through assertive outreach could be greatly improved. With the transition of Commonwealth and state and territory programs, there is a risk of emerging service gaps in these areas.

Continuity of Support

Given that that the majority of people who experience mental ill-health will not access the NDIS for whatever reason, the continued provision of services for people outside the Scheme is particularly important. The transition into the NDIS of Commonwealth programs such as Partners in Recovery (PIR), Personal Helpers and Mentors (PHaMs), Day to Day Living (D2DL) and Mental Health Respite: Carers Support, amongst others, is concerning the committee, as evidence received indicates that a significant number of current clients of those services will not be accessing the Scheme.

The committee also heard of concerns across the sector that services previously delivered by states and territories were being withdrawn before recipients of those services are properly transitioned into the NDIS.

Information, Linkages and Capacity Building (ILC)

The committee is concerned about emerging service gaps, including assertive outreach services, community based group supports, supports for carers, and the availability of services in areas such as remote communities. Some of these services are intended to be delivered through the ILC Framework. However, the ILC is still in its infancy and the current level of funding allocated to support its activities may not match the needs of the community. Furthermore, as the ILC funding is for all disabilities, there is a growing concern that psychosocial disability support services may not be adequately funded through the ILC alone.

Forensic disability services

Finally, the committee looked at the provision and continuation of services for NDIS participants in receipt of forensic disability services. The committee heard that the NDIS has potential to decrease the incarceration rates for people with a cognitive and psychosocial impairment, particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who are overrepresented amongst those in prison with complex disability support needs. Historically, this group has had mostly poor experiences or no contact with existing systems.

However, before the opportunity offered through the NDIS can be realised, access to the NDIS must be readily available and consistent within the criminal justice system. The committee heard some conflicting evidence as to how the NDIS currently supports NDIS participants in custody and what types of services, if any at all, they can access. There was no clear evidence as to how the process of referring people to become an NDIS participant was taking place within the criminal justice system. Additionally, there was no evidence of the NDIA taking a proactive role in finding a provider of last resort services for NDIS participants, including for those in indefinite detention.

To increase the focus on this cohort, Australians for Disability Justice proposed the establishment of a unit specialising in the interaction of the Scheme with the criminal justice system, which received great support from other stakeholders. The committee supports the creation of such a unit.

Conclusion

The committee received a wealth of information and evidence throughout the inquiry and thanks all those who participated. As a result, the committee has made 24 recommendations, which aim to strengthen the effectiveness of the Scheme to ensure that people with psychosocial disabilities can be appropriately supported.

Recommendations

Eligibility

Recommendation 1

2.63       The committee recommends that the NDIS Act is reviewed to assess the permanency provisions in Section 24 (1) (b) and the appropriateness of the  reference to ‘psychiatric condition’ in 24 (1) (a).

Recommendation 2

2.64       The committee recommends that a review of the NDIS (Becoming a Participant) Rules 2016 should be considered to assess the appropriateness and effectiveness of:

Recommendation 3

2.65       The committee recommends that the Australian Government ensures young people with mental ill-health who are not participants of the Scheme, have access to adequate early intervention services.

Recommendation 4

2.66       The committee recommends the NDIA, in conjunction with the mental health sector, develops and adopts a validated fit-for-purpose assessment tool to assess the eligibility of people with psychosocial disability that focuses on their functional capacity for social and economic participation.

Recommendation 5

2.67       The committee recommends the NDIA monitors eligibility rates for people with psychosocial disability to, a) understand the reasons for a higher rejection rate compared to other disabilities; and b) to build a clearer picture of the size and needs of the people who have been found ineligible for NDIS services.

Recommendation 6

2.68       The committee recommends clients currently receiving mental health services, including services under Commonwealth programs transitioning to the NDIS, namely Partners in Recovery (PIR), Personal Helpers and Mentors (PHaMs), Day to Day Living (D2DL, and Mental Health Respite: Carer Support (MHR:CS), should not have to apply for the NDIS to have guarantee of continuity of supports and access services.

Planning process

Recommendation 7

3.82       The committee recommends the NDIA develops and proactively markets resources and training for primary health care professionals about the NDIS, especially in regards to access and planning processes.

Recommendation 8

3.83       The committee recommends the Department of Social Services and the NDIA collaboratively develop a plan outlining how advocacy and assertive outreach services will be delivered beyond the transition arrangements to ensure people with a psychosocial disability and those who are hard-to-reach can effectively engage with the NDIS and/or other support programs.

Recommendation 9

3.84       The committee recommends the NDIA, in conjunction with the mental health sector, creates a specialised team of NDIS planners trained and experienced in working with people who have a mental health condition as their primary disability.

Recommendation 10

3.85       The committee recommends the NDIA develops an approach to build flexibility in plans to respond to the fluctuating needs of participants with a psychosocial disability, including allowing minor adjustments to be made without the need for a full plan review.

Recommendation 11

3.86       The committee recommends the NDIA reports on the level of engagement of carers in the planning process.

Recommendation 12

3.87       The committee recommends the NDIA publishes the results of its participants and providers pathways review, particularly in the areas related to mental health, and strategies in place to achieve improved outcomes, as well as updates on progress against targets in its Quarterly Reports.

Continuity of Support

Recommendation 13

4.67       The committee recommend the Australian, state and territory governments clarify and make public how they will provide services for people with a psychosocial disability who are not participants in the NDIS.

Recommendation 14

4.68       The committee recommends the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) conduct an audit of all Australian, state and territory services, programs and associated funding available for mental health.

Recommendation 15

4.69       The committee recommends the National Mental Health Commission be appointed in an oversight role to monitor and report on all Australian, state and territory mental health programs and associated funding, including those delivered through the primary healthcare sector.

Recommendation 16

4.70       The committee recommends the Department of Social Services and the NDIA develop an approach to ensure continuity of support is provided for carers of people with a psychosocial disability, both within and outside the NDIS.

Recommendation 17

4.71       The committee recommends the NDIA in collaboration with the Australian, state and territory governments develops a strategy to address the service gaps that exist for rural and remote communities.

Recommendation 18

4.72       The committee recommends the NDIA provides details how it is ensuring a provider of last resort is available for all NDIS participants unable to find a suitable service provider, regardless of their location, circumstances and types of approved supports.

Information, Linkages and Capacity Building (ILC)

Recommendation 19

4.73       The committee recommends the NDIA monitors the psychosocial disability supports, activities and services that are awarded funding through the ILC grant process to be able to identify and address any emerging service gaps as they may arise.

Recommendation 20

4.74       The committee recommends the NDIA undertakes a review of the effectiveness to date of the ILC program in improving outcomes for people with a psychosocial disability.

Recommendation 21

4.75       The committee recommends NDIA considers allocating specific funding for the provision of mental health services through the ILC.

Forensic disability services

Recommendation 22

5.50       The committee recommends the NDIA urgently clarifies what approved supports are available to NDIS participants in custody and how it monitors and ensures NDIS participants access the supports they are entitled to while in custody.

Recommendation 23

5.51       The committee recommends the NDIA establishes an NDIA unit specialising in the interaction of the Scheme with the criminal justice system.

Recommendation 24

5.52       The committee recommends the NDIA develops a specific strategy to deliver culturally appropriate services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with disabilities who are in the criminal justice system.

 

For more information click here